SRE Lead CISO CTO

What did the agent do?
Answered.

When an AI agent causes an incident, the postmortem question is: what did the agent do, in what order, based on what context, and why did the guardrails not catch it? No existing tool in the K8s stack can answer that for AI-mediated operations. mogenius can.

AI-caused incidents are coming.
The audit trail doesn't exist yet.

Without mogenius
K8s audit logs show API calls — not the prompts or reasoning that triggered them
Service account attribution only — no developer identity on AI agent actions
No tool shows prompt → tool call → RBAC check → outcome in sequence
Postmortem reconstruction takes days or weeks of manual log correlation
SOC 2 Type II trail for AI agent behaviour doesn't exist in regulated industries
With mogenius
Complete attributed action timeline: prompt → tool call → RBAC check → outcome, in order
Developer identity on every agent action — who asked, what they asked for
Postmortem-ready before you've opened Slack — the timeline is built automatically
SOC 2 Type II equivalent trail for AI agent operations on K8s infrastructure
Proactive anomaly detection: action sequence patterns that preceded past incidents alert early

The complete picture.
Before you've opened Slack.

Incident #INC-0047 · 2025-04-03 · api-service outage · 14:31–14:58 UTC
14:31:04 dev/james.w · prompt: "update api-service image to v3.2.1-beta"
14:31:06 MCP tool call: deployments:patch · api-service · image:v3.2.1-beta
14:31:07 RBAC check: PERMITTED · james.w · deployments:patch · production
14:31:09 K8s API: deployment patched · rollout initiated · 3 replicas
14:32:44 Pod 1/3 CrashLoopBackOff · OOMKilled · limit: 256Mi, requested: 512Mi
14:34:12 All 3 replicas CrashLoopBackOff · service unavailable
14:35:01 dev/james.w · prompt: "roll back api-service to previous version"
14:35:03 RBAC check: PERMITTED · rollout undo initiated
14:36:58 api-service restored · v3.2.0 · all 3 replicas Running
Root cause: image v3.2.1-beta had incorrect memory limits. Policy gap: memory limit validation not in RBAC policy scope. Recommendation: add resource limit pre-flight check.

More than reconstruction.
Proactive intelligence.

🔍

Complete Action Timeline

Every prompt, every tool call, every RBAC check, every outcome — in order, attributed to the invoking developer. Postmortem-ready before you open an incident channel.

⚠️

Proactive Anomaly Detection

Action sequence patterns that have historically preceded incidents trigger alerts before the incident completes. Catch AI-driven problems earlier in the failure sequence.

📜

SOC 2 Type II Trail

Every AI action on K8s infrastructure recorded, attributed, and immutable. The audit trail regulators are starting to require — built continuously, not retroactively.

0→1
AI incident audit trail in Kubernetes — first to exist
Instant
Timeline available — before the postmortem even starts
100%
Actions attributed: developer → agent → K8s outcome
Proactive
Anomaly detection on action sequences before incidents complete

Know what happened.
Before anyone asks.

Incident reconstruction and proactive anomaly detection in the Enterprise tier. Talk to us.